Sanjiv Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54129 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2021 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== Sanjiv Kumar Singh Son Of Deo Narayan Mehta Resident Of Village - Hanuman Nagar, P.S.- Chandaul, P.S.- Saur Bazaar, Distt.- Saharsha, Ward No.10, Town And Distt.- Saharsa, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajendra Narayan, Sr. Advocate Mr. Alok Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP For the BSEB :

Mr. Gyan Shankar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 12-10-2022 Learned counsel for the state filed counter affidavit in the present case. Let it be kept on record.

Heard Mr. Rajendra Narayan, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State assisted by Mr. Gyan Shankar, learned counsel for the BSEB.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he has got service on the basis of forged mark-sheet for the post of Niyojit Primary Teacher.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54129 of 2021(8) dt.12-10-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the entire prosecution story is totally false and fabricated and the alleged offences never took place. He submits that petitioner has already resigned from the said service. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that petitioner has resigned from the service, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 303 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T