Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58002/2017bail granted

Surendra Singh @ Surendra Seth @ Seji v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-14Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58002 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2015 Thana -SAMHO District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Surendra Singh @ Surendra Seth @ Seji S/o Late Damodar Singh resident of village - Sonbarsa, P.S. Shamho, District - Begusarai .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

Petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Shamho P.S. Case No.38 of 2015, registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 384, 427, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation is false, petitioner is not the contractor of the said project of construction of the road for which soil was alleged to be cut away from the plot of the informant, this present case was lodged after a delay of approximately one month without any explanation, another co-accused Rajesh Kumar @ Bittu having similar allegation was granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No.8378 of 2016 on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58002 of 2017 (2) dt.14-12-2017 2 /2 07.09.2016 and this petitioner is in custody since 10.10.2017. Having considered the said facts and circumstances, let petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Shamho P.S. Case No.38 of 2015 with condition that one of the bailors must be the family member of the petitioner.

(Arun Kumar, J.) S.Kumar/- U T