← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12899/2012dismissed

Shanti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-10Mr. Justice Vikash Jain,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12899 of 2012 ====================================================== Shanti Kumari, W/O Pankaj Kumar, resident of village - Bathnaha, P.S. Bathnaha, District - Sitamarhi, At present Elected Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat, Raj, Bathnaha West, District - Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi

3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sitamarhi- cum - Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, District - Sitamarhi

4. The District Programme Officer-cum-Convenor, Sarv Shiksha Abhiyan, Sitamarhi

5. The Block Development Officer, Bathnaha, District - Sitamarhi .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Anjani Kumar AAG10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 10-02-2015 This writ petition, by way of public interest litigation is filed challenging the decision taken by the District Administration, Sitamarhi to construct a school building at village Bathnaha. It is stated that the proposed building is far away from the residences of the students and that despite the objections of the Aam Sabha, the location is not chosen.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. We have perused the record. Initially, through order dated 02.08.2012, this Court expressed doubt about the nature of the litigation. It was mentioned that the dispute is between two

Patna High Court CWJC No.12899 of 2012 (7) dt.10-02-2015 2/2 rival groups regarding location of the school building in the village. The other order disclosed that the school building was constructed and approach road was also laid.

We do not find any merit in this writ petition. Therefore, the same is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. The interlocutory application, if any, shall stand disposed of.

(L. Narasimha Reddy, CJ) (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- U