Anant Tanti @ Anant Kumar Tanti v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43000 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-314 Year-2019 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

Anant Tanti @ Anant Kumar Tanti, son of Nebi Tanti, 2.

Aben Tanti, son of Nebi Tanti, 3.

Kari Tanti, son of Bhedi Tanti, 4.

Bhedi Tanti, son of late Tilai Tanti, 5.

Nebi Tanti, son of late Tilai Tanti, all resident of village- Parmanpur Navtoliya, P.S.-Madhepura, P.O- Parmanandpur, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bidhanesh Misra, Advocate Ms. Tanuja Mishra, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Md. Arif, APP For the Informant :

Ms. Priya Gupta, Advocate Mr. R. R. Tiwary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 16-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant, who has suo motu appeared.

2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Madhepura (Parmanandpur OP) P.S. Case No.314 of 2019 dated 29.03.2019 instituted under Section(s) 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioners and twelve others is of assaulting and snatching of Rs.2000/- from the pocket of the informant by the petitioner no. 2.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43000 of 2019 dt.16-11-2019 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that allegation of assault is general and omnibus and the injury is simple in nature.

5. Learned APP and learned counsel for the informant, from the case diary, submitted that injuries are on vital parts and further that there is also allegation of snatching Rs.2,000/- and, thus, the petitioners do not deserve privilege of pre-arrest bail

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Court is not inclined to allow the prayer for pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.

7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

8. However, in the event, the petitioners appear before the Court below and pray for bail, the same shall be considered on its own merits, in accordance with law, without being prejudiced by the present order.

9. Interim protection of no coercive steps against the petitioners given by order dated 11.07.2019 stands vacated. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) J. Alam/- AFR/NAFR U T