Mangari Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44879 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-409 Year-2021 Thana- SHEOHAR District- Sheohar ====================================================== 1.

Mangari Devi Wife of Bhikhari Rai R/v- Rampuryadu, P.S- Sheohar, DistSheohar 2.

Heena Devi W/o Indal Rai R/v- Rampuryadu, P.S- Sheohar, Dist- Sheohar 3.

Shanti Devi W/o Vindeshwar Rai R/v- Rampuryadu, P.S- Sheohar, DistSheohar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Devendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case no. 409 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 325, 354, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, accused persons want ot grab her land and construct building over it. Co-accused Ratnesh Kumar assaulted her by giving dab blow as a result of his he received head injury. Accused Bhikari Rai broken her hands. When her husband and son came there to rescue her, they were also beaten up by them. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44879 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/2 submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has got no criminal antecedent. General and omnibus allegations have been lelvelled against the petitioners. Petitioners are ladies and they have not assaulted to any one. Specific allegation of Assault is against co-accused Bhikari Rai and Ratnesh Kumar. Except one injury, all injuries received by the injured were simple in nature. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case no. 409 of 2021, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U T