Patna High CourtL.P.A/1181/2015dismissed

Pratibha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-02The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1181 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2148 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Pratibha Kumari wife of Madan Prasad Kushwaha, resident of village- Chaka Chhapra, P.S.- Saraiyya, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Department of Welfare through its Principal Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Commissioner Saran at Chapra.

4. The District Magistrate , Chapra.

5. The Deputy Director , Department of welfare , Division, Saran , Chapra.

6. The District Welfare Officer, Saran at Chapra.

7. The Principal Rajkiya Pichri Jati Balika Uccha Vidyalai, Chand Chaura at Madhuara, Chapra.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Onkar Nath, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 02-08 -2017 Seeking exception to an order dated 17.4.2015 passed by the learned Writ Court in C.W.J.C. No.2148 of 2015, this appeal has been filed under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. Records indicate that petitioner was appointed on contract basis and finding the petitioner to be a contract employee appointed for providing Midday Meal supplied by the Government

Patna High Court LPA No.1181 of 2015 dt.02-08-2017 2/2 through an N.G.O., this writ petition has been dismissed by holding that petitioner, a contract employee, does not have any right after the period of contract has come to an end.

In dismissing the writ petition on such consideration, we are of the considered view, the learned Writ Court has not committed any error warranting re-consideration.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 10.8.2017 Transmission Date N/A