← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41813/2019bail rejected

Amarjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-10-22Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41813 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2018 Thana- KARPI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Amarjeet Kumar Son of Chandeshwar Singh Resident of Village- Hansraj Bagh, P.S.- Karpi, District- Arwal ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Satyendra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, Addl Public Prosecutor For the informant : Mr. Dhirendra Kr. Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence under sections 304B/201 of the Indian Penal Code on the allegation that he killed his wife and secretly disposed of the dead body on account of non-fulfilment of dowry demand. Learned counsel for the petitioner has doubted the identification of the dead body fished out from a well. He submits that the petitioner was leading happy conjugal life, as such, sudden disappearance of his wife cannot be termed as murder by the petitioner, as alleged. Petitioner is in custody since 7.8.2018.

Learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner was in habit of demand of dowry and committing torture on the deceased soon after three years of the marriage and sometime she was not even served food.

From perusal of the impugned order dated 16.5.2019, it appears that charges have been framed but there is no progress in the trial as prosecution witnesses have not turned up till date. Keeping in view the nature of allegation, petitioner's

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41813 of 2019(3) dt.22-10-2019 2/2 prayer for bail is rejected.

Trial Court to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

Petitioner is directed to co-operate with the trial. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T