Pradeep Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41947 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-497 Year-2018 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== PRADEEP PASWAN Son of Charitra Paswan Resident of Village - Antaur, P.S.- Bahera and District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Girish Chandra Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 09-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 498A, 341, 323 and 504 IPC and Section 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act registered in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 497 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and this is the first complaint of its nature since the petitioner and the informant were married about 5-6 years ago. It is stated that the petitioner expresses his willingness to keep the informant with due dignity and honour and that it is the informant who does not want to live with the petitioner. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Benipur, Darbhanga in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 497 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41947 of 2019(2) dt.09-07-2019 2/2 ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T