← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/828/2015dismissed

Sudhanshu Shekhar Ghosh v. The Chairman State Bank Of India And ORS

2017-07-28Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.828 of 2015 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16430 of 2008 =========================================================== Sudhanshu Shekhar Ghosh, son of Nishi Chandra Ghosh, resident of Mohalla: Naya Tola, Bihari, Back of P.W.D. Inspection Bungalow, Jamui, P.O., P.S. and District: Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner - Appellant

Versus

1. The Chairman State Bank of India, State Bank Bhawan, Madam Cama Road, Backway Reclamation, Mumbai-400021.

2. General Manager, Net Work- II, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Patna.

3. Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India-cum-Appellate Authority, Zonal Office, Bhagalpur.

4. Assistant General Manager (Operation)-cum-Disciplinary Authority, State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Bhagalpur.

5. Mr. J.P. Yadav, Chief Manager, Domestic Enquiry Section, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Patna.

.... .... Respondents - Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Appellant/s : None.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kaushlendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 28-07-2017 When the matter is called out, no one appears on behalf of the appellant. Counsel for the respondent Bank is present. From perusal of the order impugned dated 23.02.2015 it is evident that the Writ Application was dismissed by the learned Single Judge on the ground that the question of suspension and its correctness is not required to be gone into in view of the dismissal of the appellant by the respondent Bank on conclusion of the

Patna High Court LPA No.828 of 2015 dt.28-07-2017 2/2 departmental proceeding. There is no infirmity in the order of the learned Single Judge.

Appeal has no merit. It is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 28.07.2017 Transmission Date N/A