Arjun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4030 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2000 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
ARJUN YADAV SON OF LATE PATI YADAV RESIDENT OF DHANGAIN, PRAKHAND - BARACHATTI, PANCHAYAT - PATLUKA, POLICE STATION - BARACHATTI, DISTRICT - GAYA 2.
DHANESHWARI DEVI WIFE OF ARJUN YADAV RESIDENT OF DHANGAIN, PRAKHAND - BARACHATTI, PANCHAYAT - PATLUKA, POLICE STATION - BARACHATTI, DISTRICT - GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-06-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the accused persons is of committing torture and assault and thereafter caused death of the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4030 of 2021(2) dt.23-06-2021 2/2 tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner no.1 is father-in-law and petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law of the deceased. They are separate in mess and property from the husband of the deceased. They have got no knowledge regarding the present prosecution.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also the lockdown, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on their personal bonds to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 98 of 2000, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioners shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T