Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48987/2025bail granted

Md. Irfan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-31Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48987 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2025 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Md. Irfan Son of Md. Rafik vill- Chintamanchak, P.S.- Mokama, DisttPatna 2.

Md Raju son of Md. Kaium vill- Chintamanchak, P.S.- Mokama, DisttPatna 3.

Md. Guddu son of Md. Moin vill- Chintamanchak, P.S.- Mokama, DisttPatna 4.

Md. Dilbar @ Dilawar Son of Md. Barkat vill- Chintamanchak, P.S.- Mokama, Distt- Patna 5.

Md. Salam son of Md. Aslam vill- Chintamanchak, P.S.- Mokama, DisttPatna 6.

Md. Imran Son of Md. Rafik vill- Chintamanchak, P.S.- Mokama, DisttPatna 7.

Md. Samir son of Md. Samsher vill- Chintamanchak, P.S.- Mokama, DisttPatna 8.

Md. Samshad son of Md. Samir vill- Chintamanchak, P.S.- Mokama, DisttPatna 9.

Md. Saddam son of Md. Hakim vill- Chintamanchak, P.S.- Mokama, DisttPatna 10.

Md Taiban son of Md. Barkat vill- Chintamanchak, P.S.- Mokama, DisttPatna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 352, 351(2),

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48987 of 2025(2) dt.31-07-2025 2/3 109(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, these petitioners assaulted informant and his brother by means of lathi, danda.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no specific allegation of overt act against these petitioners. Doctor has found the injuries sustained by the injured to be simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, simple injuries and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate III, Barh, Patna in connection with Mokama P. S. Case No. 100 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48987 of 2025(2) dt.31-07-2025 3/3 Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T