Rambharosh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55459 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2021 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.

RAMBHAROSH YADAV SON OF DHANSHI YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PURBI THATHA, P.S.- MANSI DISTRICT- KHAGARIA 2.

RAMSHIV YADAV SON OF DHANSHI YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PURBI THATHA, P.S.- MANSI DISTRICT- KHAGARIA 3.

KAILASH YADAV SON OF LATE GANESHI YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PURBI THATHA, P.S.- MANSI DISTRICT- KHAGARIA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-06-2022 At the outset of argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition of petitioner No.3, Kailash Yadav.

Permission is accorded.

Anticipatory bail petition of petitioner No.3 is dismissed as withdrawn.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners No. 1 and 2 apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 307 and some other ancillary Sections of the Indian Penal Code and u/s

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55459 of 2021(2) dt.28-06-2022 2/2 27 of Arms Act.

As per the prosecution case, all the accused persons re alleged to have made indiscriminate firing but no one sustained any injury.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case. It is submitted that petitioners have been implicated in this case due to previous enmity and though there is allegation of firing but no one has sustained any injury. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts of the case and nature of accusation, let the petitioners No. 1 and 2, above named, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Mansi PS case No. 22/2021, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T