← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53990/2021allowed

Rajdeo Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-01Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53990 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-514 Year-2020 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran ====================================================== Rajdeo Rai S/O Jitendra Rai @ Manai Rai R/O Mohalla- Telpa, P.S.- Chapra Town, District- Saran (Chapra) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant by means of lathi-danda, sword and knife resultantly he received injury.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53990 of 2021(4) dt.01-08-2022 2/2 omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. He submits that though the injury found upon the victim is grievous in nature but there is specific allegation against co-accused Vinod Rai. He submits that some of accused persons have already been granted bail by the learned court below itself. He further submits that petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 514 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T