Ekramul Haque @ Ekaram Akram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40394 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-439 Year-2020 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Ekramul Haque @ Ekaram Akram son of Munna Akram Resident of VillageBhairoganj Bazar, P.S.- Bhairoganj, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar No 7, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-10-2021 Heard the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bagaha Bhairoganj P.S. Case No. 439 of 2020 registered for the offences under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

In view of the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Ram Binay Yadav Vs. The State of Bihar reported in [ 2019(2) PLJR 1089 (Full Bench)], this application is not maintainable as huge quantity of liquor has been recovered from the motorcycle.

Learned counsel or the petitioner submits that two persons, namely, Anand Srivastav and Guddu Srivastav have been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.04.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34834 of 2020.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40394 of 2020(2) dt.28-10-2021 2/2 In view of the fact that two persons are not the occupants of the vehicle, therefore, this petitioner does not derive any benefit from that order.

Accordingly, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) BT/- U T