← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/1423/2015disposed

Anil Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-21The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1423 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3537 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Anil Kumar S/o Late Baijnath Singh Resident of Village & P.O. Rampur, P.S. Suryagarha, District Lakhisarai.

2. Yogendra Prasad Mandal S/o Sri Lakhan Lal Mandal Resident of Village & P.O. Pakra, P.S. Navagachhiya, District Bhagalpur.

3. Nawal Kishore S/o Late Gopal Sharan Singh Resident of Village Bakuan, P.O. Poaawan, P.S. Naubatpur, District Patna.

4. Subodh Kumar S/o Sri Anant Prasad Kunwar Resident of Village Tulsipur, P.S. Kharih, District Bhagalpur.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director (Primary Education), Bihar, Patna.

3. Suman Kumar S/o Late Chandrasekhar Prasad Sharma Resident of Village Katiya, P.O. Punasia, P.S. Rajaun, District Banka.

4. Om Prakash Yadav S/o Sri Jaleshwar Yadav Resident of Village Subba Nagar, P.O. Budh Chak, P.S. Kahalgaon, District Bhagalpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Tewari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Dhurjati Kumar, GP-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 21-08-2017 During the pendency of this matter, the appellants have already been granted promotion and now if the appellants have any grievance with regard to seniority being granted to them vis-à-vis the persons who have obtained Sahitya Alankar degree from a non-recognized University and still continuing, the appellants may represent to the competent authority and the

Patna High Court LPA No.1423 of 2015 (2) dt.21-08-2017 2/2 competent authority shall consider and decide the representation with regard to the seniority in accordance with law within three months and thereafter any grievance still subsisting, liberty shall be available to the appellants to ventilate the same afresh in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid, the appeal stands disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) S.Pandey/- U