Ravindra Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42692 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2025 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria ====================================================== Ravindra Kumar Sah, S/o Bhupendra Sah, R/o Village- Achra, Ward No.6, PS- Fulkaha, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 130 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss Section 309(4) of the BNS Act and further added Sections 310(2), 317(3) of the BNS Act and Section 25(B)(a), 26,35 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, while the informant was going to Purnea with the tractor loaded with 160 sacks of paddy, some miscreants came on one black colour Alto and one white colour Scorpio and blocked the informant's way at Rampur Kodarkatti Musahari on the point of pistol. They got
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42692 of 2025(2) dt.15-07-2025 2/3 the informant seated in his car and took away the informant's tractor. Thereafter, they dropped the informant near Kushiargao Park after snatching his mobile phone.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. It appears from the seizure list that a car bearing registration no. BR38D4671 and two motorcycles which were used in committing loot and a loaded country made pistol have been recovered from the house of co-accused Arwaz. There is no recovery made from conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 26.03.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned/C.J.M., Araria, in connection with Araria P.S. Case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42692 of 2025(2) dt.15-07-2025 3/3 No. 130 of 2025, with the condition ;- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled..
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) khushbu/- U T