← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43978/2019bail granted

Jai Krishna Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-18Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43978 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Purnia ====================================================== Jai Krishna Sah, Son of Sri Murlidhar Sah, Resident of Village - Kajha Baniyapatti, P.S.- K.Nagar, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Suman Kumari, D/o- Sri Bhajju Sah, Resident of Village - Damaili, Bandh Tola, P.S.- Mirganj, District- Purnea ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 19 of 2019 registered under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The accusation is of torturing the informant-opposite party no. 2 by her husband and in-laws due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and removing from her matrimonial house. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in fact, marriage of the petitioner was not performed with the informant and earlier the informant had filed a Complaint Case No. 1005 of 2017 in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, which was dismissed under Section 203 of the Cr.P.C. on 07.05.2018. Thereafter,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43978 of 2019(2) dt.18-07-2019 2/2 informant filed again Complaint Case No. 1157 of 2018, which is still pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea and again on same facts, informant-opposite party no. 2 has lodged the present case with false allegation.

Ont the other hand, learned counsel for the informantopposite party no. 2 submits that the marriage of the informant was performed with this petitioner and regarding which, Mukhiya and Surpanch has issued the certificate on 30.06.2019. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M, Purnea, in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 19 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T