Arman Khan @ Armanullah Khan @ Md. Armanullah Khan @ Foto Khan @ Rehan Khan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49569 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-493 Year-2023 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== Arman Khan @ Armanullah Khan @ Md. Armanullah Khan @ Foto Khan @ Rehan Khan son of Late Tauhid Khan @ Mallu Khan Village- Hamjapur Waris Nagar Ps- Amas Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Javed Jafar Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 18-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Gurua P.S. Case no. 493 of 2023 registered under section 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the petitioner on being arrested in connection with Amas P.S. Case no. 341 of 2023, on information provided by the petitioner that he had handed over arms and ammunition to coaccused Harendra Kumar and Munna Kumar, a raid was conducted. It is stated that on raid, arms and ammunition details of which have been mentioned in the F.I.R, was recovered from the house of Harendra Kumar and Munna Kumar. It is further stated that Harendra Kumar disclosed that the recovered

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49569 of 2024(2) dt.18-07-2024 2/2 weapons were given to him by the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated because of his criminal antecedents. No information as alleged has been given by the petitioner nor any recovery has been affected on the basis of the same. The petitioner is in custody since 8.1.2024 and charge sheet has been submitted in this case.

5. The application for bail is opposed by the learned APP for the State who submits that the petitioner is accused in as many as 15 cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation against the petitioner in the FIR, no incriminating article having been recovered from his possession his being in custody since 8.1.2024 and charge-sheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 493 of 2023, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Sherghati, Gaya.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Namita/ravikr/- U T