Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57227/2017bail granted

Ranjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-13Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57227 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -102 Year- 2016 Thana -KAUAKOL District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Ranjeet Yadav S/o Chalitar Yadav, R/o Vill- Pakribarawan, P.S.- Pakribarawan, Distt. Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kawakol P.S. Case No.102 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the case was initially registered against unknown persons. In course of investigation, one Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Yadav was arrested and he in his confessional statement disclosed the name of the petitioner. The co-accused Guddu Yadav and Sintu Yadav have been allowed bail in Cr. Misc.No.6725 of 2017 and 1994 of 2017 on 02.03.2017 and 10.03.2017 respectively. The case of the petitioner stands on similar footing as nothing incriminating material has been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57227 of 2017 (2) dt.13-12-2017 recovered from his possession. The petitioner is in custody since 22.09.2017.

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the submission. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of bail is allowed. The petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. -IV, Nawada in connection with Kawakol P.S. Case No.102 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of allegation, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Sanjay Kumar, J) Harish/- U