← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54297/2021rejected

Prince Kumar Yadav @ Prince Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-08Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54297 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

PRINCE KUMAR YADAV @ PRINCE YADAV Son of Santosh Yadav Resident of Village- Patraha, Ward No. 01, P.S.- Madhepura, DistrictMadhepura. 2.

Santosh Yadav @ Fantus Yadav @ Sanjiv Kumar Son of Birendra Yadav Resident of Village- Patraha, Ward No. 01, P.S.- Madhepura, DistrictMadhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Excise Case No. 77 of 2021 registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to illegal motive of Police. Further submission is that entire allegations levelled against the petitioners are false and concocted. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54297 of 2021(2) dt.08-04-2022 2/2 Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioners by contending that the alleged recovery of illicit liquor has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioners. Hence, this is not a fit case of anticipatory bail.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the opposite party, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners is rejected. utkarsh/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T