Patna High CourtCWJC/7879/2016disposed

Md. Muslim v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-04-10Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7879 of 2016 ====================================================== Md. Muslim son of Mohamad Amir Hasan, Resident of village- Buniyapur, Post- Baniyapur-I, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Primary Education Department, Bihar, Patna

2. The Director, Primary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra

4. The District Programme Officer-cum-Primary Education and Sarva Sikha Abhiyan, Saran

5. The District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra

6. The Block Education Officer, Baniyapur Block, District- Saran

7. Md. Amaullah, Headmaster Primary School, Urdu Dhangarhan, Baniyapur-I, Saran

8. The Mukhia, Baniyapur, Panchayat, Distt- Saran

9. Anil Singh, son of not known to the petitioner, resident of village- Baniyapur, P.S.- Baniyapur, District- Saran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ratan Kumar Kumar For the Respondent/s :

A.C. to G.P.-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 10-04-2018 Petitioner is granted liberty to file fresh representation before the District Programme Officer wherein he may place the relevant records showing the utilization of the fund allocated by the State Government for construction in the school.

In case, such representation is filed by the petitioner enclosing the relevant document, the District Programme Officer shall examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a maximum period of sixty days

Patna High Court CWJC No.7879 of 2016(2) dt.10-04-2018 2/2 from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and thereafter, raise fresh demand for depositing by the petitioner in case on measurement it is found that the petitioner has not competed the construction to the tune of amount allocated by the State Government.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U