Ankit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43673 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2026 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Ankit Kumar S/O Ashok Ray Resident of Vill-Piroi, Ward No.-12, P.S.- Goraul, District-Vaishali.

2.

Pintu kumar Son of Ashok Ray Resident of Vill-Piroi, Ward No.-12, P.S.- Goraul, District-Vaishali.

3.

Chotu Kumar Son of Sat Narayan Ray Resident of Vill-Piroi, Ward No.-12, P.S.-Goraul, District-Vaishali.

4.

Sudhir Kumar Son of Sat Narayan Ray Resident of Vill-Piroi, Ward No.-12, P.S.-Goraul, District-Vaishali.

5.

Sat Narayan Ray Son of Late Bhukhalu Ray Resident of Vill-Piroi, Ward No.-12, P.S.-Goraul, District-Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 04.03.2026, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, came to the shop of informant, abused him, assaulted him and snatched his cash and mobile phone.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43673 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/3

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are Pattidars and due to long standing land dispute, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been levelled against these petitioners. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, simple in nature. Rest of the allegations are ornamental in order to make the case grave. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, nature of injuries allegedly caused by these petitioners and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43673 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 138 of 2026, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T