Sujay Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13613 of 2016 =========================================================== Sujay Kumar Mishra, son of Late Nawal Kishore Mishra, resident of Village - Chandauna, Police Station - Jalley, District - Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. Lalit Narayan Mithila University, through the Vice - Chancellor, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

4. The Vice-Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

5. The Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

6. The Finance Officer, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, AC to SC-16 For L.N.M. University : Mr. Chandra Mohan Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 15-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

2. On behalf of the University, a counter affidavit has been filed, in which statements have been made with regard to payment to the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance with regard to leave encashment and other amount has been paid to the petitioner, as per averment made in the counter affidavit and the documents enclosed thereto. He submits that only grievance,

Patna High Court CWJC No.13613 of 2016 dt.15-05-2018 2/2 which remain addressed by the University is for payment of provident fund.

4. In view of the above, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise a grievance as to nonpayment of provident fund before the University. In case, such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of one month from today, the respondent University is directed to examine the claim of the petitioner with regard to payment of provident fund. The University is required to decide the claim of the petitioner within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of filing of such representation along with a copy of this order and ensure payment of provident fund amount within a further period of 30 days from the date of such decision along with statutory interest whatever is available.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date19.05.2018 Transmission Date