Rajnish Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13376 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Rajnish Kumar, son of Shri R.N. Choudhary, resident of Darbhanga, Opposite Mazar Bangali Tola, Laheria Sarai, P.O. + P.S. - Laheria Sarai, District - Darbhanga.
2. Shankar Kunal, son of Sri Deoraj Singh, resident of Mamrejpur, P.O. - Akauni, P.S. - Daudnagar, District - Aurangabad
3. Nishant Raj, son of Shri Rajendra Prasad Mahto, resident of Road No. 3A, Adarsh Nagar, Samastipur
4. Ranjan Kumar, son of Shri Raj Kumar Resident of T.T. More, Ramna, P.O. + P.S. - Sherghati, District - Gaya.
5. Kavita Kumari, D/O Jitendra Kumar Singh, resident of West Judges Colony, Near Saguna More, P.O. + P.S. - Danapur, District - Patna.
6. Prabha Kumari, D/O Shambhu Nath Singh, resident of Chainpura, P.O. - Begampur, P.S. - Bypass, Patna City, District - Patna .... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Director, Senior Secondary Education, Department Of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5. The Bihar School Examination Board, Patna through Its Chairman.
6. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrit Abhijat, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, A.A.G.-4 Mr. Sanjay Kumar, A.C. to A.A.G.-4 For the Board : Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-11-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that subsequently fresh selection has been made, in which all the petitioners have been accommodated.
In such view of the matter, learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CWJC No.13376 of 2013 (4) dt.08-11-2016 2/2 petitioners does not want to press this application. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as not pressed. This order has been passed in presence of learned counsel for the State.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U