Amarnath Akela And ANR v. The Union Of India And ORS
Patna High Court MJC No.2046 of 2015 (8) dt.29-03-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2046 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4164 of 2008 ======================================================
1. Amarnath Akela Son of Sri Saryu Sharan Singh
2. Premnath Akela Son of Sri Saryu Sharan Singh Both R/o Mohalla Khajpura, P.O. B.V. College, P.S. Airdrome, District Patna
1. .... .... Petitioner/s
2. Versus
1. The Union of India through Mr. Aditya Kumar Mittal, General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur, Vaishali, Bihar
2. Sri Aditya Kumar Mittal, General manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur, Vaishali, Bihar
3. Sri Indrajit Kumar, Engineer in Chief, Construction, East Central Railway, Mahendru Patna (now at Digha)
4. Sri Dharam Prakash, Superintending Engineer, East Central Railway, Rail Pul Nirman Division, Digha, Patna
5. Sri Sanjay Kumar, Assistant Engineer, East Central Railway, Ganga Rail Bridge Construction Division, Digha, Patna
6. The State of Bihar through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh , Chief Secretary, Bihar Patna Old Secretariat, Patna
7. Sri Abhay Kumar Singh, District Magistrate, Patna
8. Sri Inamul Haque Siddiqui, District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vishal Saurabh, Adv. Mr. Dilip Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Harish Kumar- GP- 8 Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 8.
29-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, State and
Patna High Court MJC No.2046 of 2015 (8) dt.29-03-2018 learned counsel for the Railways.
Learned counsel for the Railways submits that the measurement was conducted in the presence of the parties and now the land has been demarcated. Therefore, whatever may be disputed question of facts cannot be resolved in a contempt proceeding.
The application, thus, stands dismissed with a liberty to the petitioners to pursue their remedy before the appropriate authority which is tenable under law. (Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U