Chandra Shekhar Choudhary And ORS. v. Bhola Mishra And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Second Appeal No.1 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Chandra Shekhar Choudhary Son of Jagal Narayan Choudhary

2. Arun Kumar Choudhary

3. Manoj Kumar Choudhary

4. Bhawesh kumar Choudhary All sons of Chandra Shekhar Choudhary resident of Mohalla- Mirjapur, Police station- Town , Post Office- Lal Bagh , District- Darbhanga.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. Bhola Mishra son of Late Rajeshwar Mishra

2. Gobind Mishra

3. Madan Mishra

4. Raman Kumar Mishra All sons of Bhola Mishra. null

5. Kanhai Mishra

6. Sohan Kumar Mishra

7. Mohan Kumar Mishra All sons of Gobind Mishra All residents of Mohalla- Mirjapur, Police Station- Town , Post Office- lalbagh, DistrictDarbhanga. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sameer Ranjan For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-11-2017 The orders dated 18.07.2017, 02.08.2017, 07.08.2017 and 22.08.2017, are indicative of the fact how seriously and how casually this second appeal is being conducted. The said orders are being reproduced hereinbelow :- '18.07.2017 - It has been submitted at the Bar that Mr. Sameer Ranjan, learned counsel for the appellants is suffering from viral fever.

Put up this matter after one week as a matter of last

Patna High Court SA No.1 of 2015 (10) dt.30-11-2017 2/2 indulgence to the appellants.

02.08.2017 :- Nobody appears on behalf of the appellant in spite of repeated calls for hearing under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC. It transpires that this matter was earlier also adjourned on the prayer on behalf of the appellants.

Put up this matter tomorrow, by way of last indulgence to the appellants.

07.08.2017 :- As prayed for on behalf of the appellant, put up this matter after a week.

22.08.2017 :- The order-sheet speaks for itself. At least on three occasions; the matter has been adjourned on the ground of absence of the learned counsel for the appellants. It is being submitted by the learned counsel that the learned counsel for the appellants has gone to home village, which area is now affected by flood. Request is, accordingly, being made for adjournment for two weeks.

List this case under the same heading on 05.09.2017.' Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. This Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for default. Sanjeev/- (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) U T