← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48388/2024bail granted

Laxman Mahto @ Laxman Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-23Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48388 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2024 Thana- MANIHARI District- Katihar ====================================================== Laxman Mahto @ Laxman Singh, S/o Ram Prayag Mahto @ Prayag Singh R/o vill - Mara Line (Bagh mara), P.S. - Manihari, Distt. - Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of four cases and the allegation is of recovery of 68 litres of liquor from bank of Ganga river.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48388 of 2024(2) dt.23-07-2024 2/3 even alleged recovery is from a place, which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated at the instance of Chaukidar. It is next submitted that it appears that the Chaukidar in order to save the real culprit falsely implicated the petitioner taking advantage of his antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum-Exclusive Special Excise Court No.II, Katihar in connection with Manihari P. S. Case No.89 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48388 of 2024(2) dt.23-07-2024 3/3

8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than four cases, in that event, the present anticipatory bail application shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T