← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44854/2025dismissed

Saroj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-06Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44854 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-728 Year-2023 Thana- MANER District- Patna ====================================================== Saroj Kumar S/o Subhash Rai R/o Village- Daudpur Bagicha, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Sahpur, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Ranjan For the State :

Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. This is an application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner for the offences alleged under Sections 376(D) and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Maner P.S.Case No. 728 of 2023.

3. According to allegation, while the informant was returning from market, the petitioner intercepted her on her way, and snatched her mobile set. He brought her to Chhitnawan river and committed rape upon her.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. Other co accused persons have been granted bail by this Court.

5. So far as other co-accused persons are concerned,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44854 of 2025(8) dt.06-02-2026 2/2 co-accused, Satendra Kumar was not named by the victim in her statement under Section 164 of the CrPC., whereas the victim did not identify co-accused Sonu Kumar during her deposition in court. The petitioner is the main accused and the victim has named the petitioner in her statement under Section 164 of the CrPC.

6. Taking into account the entire aspect of the matter as well as the allegation levelled against the petitioner, he does not deserve the privilege of bail, which is hereby rejected. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T