← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6794/2018allowed

Anshul Kumar Sahu And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2024-01-18Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6794 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2014 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Anshul Kumar Sahu and Anr Son of Sri Arun Kumar Sahu, resident of Mohalla- Bulandwar Sahi, Police Station- Keonjhar, District- Keonjhar, Odisha.

2.

Shreya @ Kumari Madhu, Daughter of Rajesh Prasad, Resident of 13/D, Burdwan Compound, Ranchi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar.

2.

Simmi Mala, Wife of Dr. Amit Kumar Sahu, D/o Surendra Kumar, presently residing at Panchasheel Nagar, Khagari Road, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna800012. ... ... Opposite Party/s Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sri Shyameshwar Dayal, APP For the O.P. No.2 :

Mr. Mohit Agrawal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State along with learned counsel for the O.P. No.2, Mr. Mohit Agrawal.

2. The learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 at the outset submits that he has instruction to make submission that the O.P. No.2 shall have no grievance in the event if the present quashing application is allowed, as the dispute between the husband and wife has been resolved and the petitioners herein are father-inlaw and mother-in-law of the O.P. No.2.

3. The learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6794 of 2018(3) dt.18-01-2024 2/2 the petitioners also submit that the dispute between the O.P. No.2 and her husband stands resolved.

4. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the O.P. No.2, the order dated 05.12.2017 passed by the learned A.C.J.M., Danapur in Danapur P.S. Case No.79 of 2014 whereby cognizance of offence under Sections 341, 313, 323, 498(A), 504, 34 and 120(B) of the IPC read with Section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act has been take, is hereby quashed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T