Naval Yadav And ANR v. The Union Of India And ORS

Patna High Court CWJC No.18735 of 2016 (4) dt.10-09-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18735 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Naval Yadav, son of Sri Jawahar Yadav,

2. Ram Pravesh Yadav, son of Late Sukan Yadav, Both are resident of Village- Deokuli, P.S.- Makhadumpur, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary Road Transport and National High Ways Ministry, New Delhi.

2. The Deputy Secretary, Road Transport and National Highways Ministry, New Delhi.

3. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Divisional Commissioner Magadh Pramandal, Gaya.

5. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6. The Collector, District- Jehanabad.

7. The Land Acquisition Officer, District- Jehanabad.

8. The District Nilam Patra Padadhikari, District- Jehanabad.

9. The Circle Officer, Circle- Mukhadumpur, District Jehanabad.

10. Raj Nandan Yadav, son of Late Nathun Yadav, Village- Deokuli, P.O.- Serthua, P.S.- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Roy,GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2018 After some argument, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum/competent court of civil jurisdiction for redressal of his grievances. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U