Mithun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43427 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2025 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Mithun Kumar S/o Purushottam Sah R/o Simrahi, Ward No. 08, PSRaghopur, Distt.- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjeev Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Pushpa Sinha.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-07-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 86 of 2025 registered for the offence under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act.
3. The recovery is of 81 bottles of Wiscof Cough Syrup.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. The petitioner is in custody since 12.03.2025. He further submits that it is not clear from whom the alleged recovery was made.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43427 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 2/2 as well as the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this application for regular bail is allowed.
7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Supaul/concerned Court below in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 86 of 2025 subject to condition that:- (i).
The petitioner will mark his attendance at the Raghopur Police Station on every Sunday of each month. Any default in appearance at the Police Station would result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. (ii) Bailors will be close blood relatives of the petitioner.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T