Jaideo Prasad v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3452 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -115 Year- 2016 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- SHEOHAR ======================================================
1. Jaideo Prasad, Son of Late Shiv Prasad, Resident of Village Padrahi, P.S. + Dist. Sheohar.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Rani Kumari, W/o Santosh Kumar, Daughter of Ramlal Sah, Resident of Village Sheohar, Ward No. 4, P.S. + Dist.- Sheohar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 115 of 2016 registered under Sections 498A, 354B, 380 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of torture in various manners for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry by her in-laws' family. Thereafter, she was ousted from her matrimonial house. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner, being the retired government servant, is father-in-law of the complainant. He has falsely been implicated in this case. On perusal of Annexure-2, Solemn Affirmation of the complainant, she did not state against the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3452 of 2017 (2) dt.15-02-2017 2/2 petitioner, father-in-law, with regard to make illicit relation with her forcibly.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Sheohar in connection with Sheohar Complaint Case No. 115 of 2016 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Arvind Srivastava, J) Shail/- U T