Bablu Murmu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58101 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2021 Thana- BARHARA KOTHI District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Bablu Murmu Son Of Sri Chandu Murmu Village- Jamun Tola, Latraha, P.S.- Barhara Kothi, Distt.-PURNEA 2.

Ganja Murmu Son Of Sri Chandu Murmu Village- Jamun Tola, Latraha, P.S.- Barhara Kothi, Distt.- Purnea 3.

Babaji Tuddu Son Of Late Darogi Manjhi Resident Of Village- Dahar Tola, Bangathi, Ward No.-07, Latraha, P.S.- Barhara, Distt.-PURNEA 4.

Dhumma Tuddu Son Of Late Darogi Manjhi Resident Of Village- Dahar Tola, Bangathi, Ward No.-07, Latraha, P.S.- Barhara, Distt.-PURNEA 5.

Mittan Tuddun @ Ashok Manjhi Son Of Late Darogi Manjhi Resident Of Village- Dahar Tola, Bangathi, Ward No.-07, Latraha, P.S.- Barhara, Distt.- PURNEA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 27-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the accused persons including petitioners is that all the accused persons assaulted the informant with intention to kill him due to which the informant sustained injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58101 of 2021(2) dt.27-04-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that all the injuries are simple in nature and there was no motive to kill the informant and as such Section 307 of the IPC is not attracted and other Sections are bailable. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Purnea in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No. 131 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T