Saurav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44095 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2025 Thana- GAIGHAT District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Saurav Kumar S/O Ajay Kumar Singh @ Ajay Singh R/O VillageMakrandpur, P.S- Gaighat, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025 Heard Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 02 of 2025 registered under Sections 109,61(2), of the BNS and Sections 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, one person fired upon the informant, who received fire arm injury on his right side of the chest. It has been alleged against the petitioner that he had hired a shooter to take the life of the informant.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner submitted that merely on suspicion the petitioner has been made
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44095 of 2025(3) dt.15-10-2025 2/3 accused. The direct allegation of firing is against some unknown accused persons with whom the petitioner is not connected. The petitioner has clean antecedent. On these grounds, the petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR I find that the informant sustained injury on vital part of the body. The learned District Court is directed to call for the final opinion of the doctor in respect of the injury report of the injured persons and if it is found that the same is simple in nature, then in that case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on prearrest bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District Court where the case is pending in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 02 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. The learned District Court is directed to verify
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44095 of 2025(3) dt.15-10-2025 3/3 the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.
8. Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of.
(Purnendu Singh, J) Ashishsingh/- U T