Zer Afashan Begam v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 18567 of 2015 =========================================================== Zer Afashan Begam D/o Late Nazrul Haque, Driver Hawaldar, BMP-V, Patna, Presently residing at BMP-5, Quarter No.-6, P.O.- BVC, P.S.- Airport, DistrictPatna-14. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. DGP, Bihar Police Patna.

3. ADGP, BMP, Patna.

4. Commandant (Samadeshta), Bihar Military Police, BMP-5, Patna.

5. Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar.

6. The District Magistrate -cum- Chairman, District Compassionate Committee, Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== For the Petitioner/s : Mr Saroj Kr Singh, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr Rakesh Kr Shrivastave, AC to GP XV =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 30-04-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to implead the Collector, Patna who is the Chairman of the District Compassionate Appointment Committee as respondent to the instant writ petition in view of certain developments subsequent to filing of the writ petition, indicated in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent-State. Permission is granted. 2 Counsel for the petitioner may implead District Magistrate, Patna as respondent No 6 to the instant writ petition during course of the day.

3 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State.

Patna High Court CWJC No.18567 of 2015 dt.30-04-2018 2/2 4 Since the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment has been recommended by the office of the Commandant, BMP - V, Patna to the District Magistrate -cumChairman, District Compassionate Appointment Committee, Patna for consideration under Memo No 39 dated 06.01.2016 (Annexure H to the counter affidavit), the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment now has to be examined in light of the said recommendations.

5 In view of the said development, no useful purpose would be served to keep the instant writ petition pending. 6 This Court would only notice that recommendation, as contained in Annexure H is dated 05.01.2016. It is, therefore, expected that final decision on the said recommendation may be taken by the newly added respondent expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The claim of the petitioner should be disposed of in accordance with law within the period indicated hereinabove. 7 The writ petition is disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 30.04.2018 Transmission Date NA