Bisheshwar Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1375 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3536 of 2010 ====================================================== Bisheshwar Prasad Singh Son Of Late Singheshwar Prasad Singh Resident Of Village & Post - Ramdiri, P.S. Matihani ( Now Begusarai ), District - Begusarai At Present Residing At Jai Prakash Colony, Madhubani, P.S. Khanchi Hat, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Shri Amarjit Sinha, Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

3. Shri M. Sharwan, Director, Primary Education, Human Resource Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

4. The District Education Officer Establishment Committee Through Shri Manish Kumar Verma, District Magistrate, Patna

5. Shri Manish Kumar Verma, District Magistrate, Purnea

6. Shri Shiv Nath Rajak, District Programme Officer ( Establishment ), Purnea, Erstwhile Known As District Superintendent Of Education, Purnea

7. Shri Shailendra Bhushan, District Education Officer, Munger .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anshul ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 25-10-2018 In view of the statements made in Paragraph No.8 of the show cause saying that the bill of the petitioner for a sum of Rs.1,46,931/- has already been paid, nothing remains to proceed with in this matter.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has tried to impress upon this Court that in view of the order of the learned writ Court, some consequential action would be required to be taken by the

Patna High Court MJC No.1375 of 2014 (7) dt.25-10-2018 2/2 Opposite Parties in the matter of fixation of pension of the petitioner and recalculation of the Earned Leave. If it is so, the petitioner will be at liberty to file an appropriate representation with the competent authority who will look into the same and do the same within a reasonable period of two months in true compliance of the order of the learned writ Court. If the claim of the petitioner in the representation is a consequence of the order of the learned writ Court, it is expected that the competent authority will do the needful without compelling the petitioner to further reject the matter.

This matter is disposed off, accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) R.R.Ojha./- U