← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47173/2024allowed

Ranjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-12Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47173 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2022 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Ranjit Yadav Son Of Tuno Yadav Village- Basua, Ps- Pasraha, Dist- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 386, 307, 341, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case is that while the informant and his friends were going towards Saharsa, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons surrounded and started assaulting them due to non-fulfillment of extortion money. The petitioner and co-accused also fired but the informant and other narrowly escaped.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47173 of 2024(2) dt.12-07-2024 2/2 falsely been implicated in this case due to previous enmtiy. It is further submitted that no one sustained injury by firearm in the alleged incident. No any illegal arms have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The specific allegation of demanding ransom is against co-accused Bambam Yadav. Similarly situated other co-accuse person has already been granted bail by this Court vide Annexure-3 of this petition. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 24.06.2023.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6.Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Gogri (Paura) P.S. Case No. 247 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Khagaria. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shubham/- U T