← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1978/2021bail granted

Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-04-08Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1978 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2010 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son of Ramashish Yadav R/O Village- Barauni-1, P.S.- Teghra, District- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Hussamuddin Azad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-04-2021 From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that bail-bond of the petitioner has been cancelled on 21.04.2018. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is a labour and went outside of State to earn livelihood and due to mistake of the Pairvikar, pairvi could not be filed on 01.04.2018 and as such, bail-bond was cancelled. Petitioner is in custody since 06.10.2020.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the bail application of petitioner is allowed.

Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge - II, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 24 of 2010 (S.T.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1978 of 2021(3) dt.08-04-2021 2/2 No. 417 of 2011), on the following conditions: "(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court below and shall remain physically present, as directed by the court below, and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail."

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T