Chhotelal Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18235 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -114 Year- 2017 Thana -CHANDRADEEP District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Chhotelal Yadav, Son of Hira Yadav,

2. Santosh Yadav, Son of Hira Yadav,

3. Hira Yadav, Son of Late Narayan Yadav,

4. Kavita Devi, Wife of Hira Yadav, All R/o Village- Parsama, P.S.- Chandradip, District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chandradeep P.S.Case nO.114 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

There is allegation of kidnapping the wife of the brother of the petitioners.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioner nos. 1 & 2 are brothers and petitioner nos. 3 & 4 are father-in-law and mother-in-law and they are living separately, which has come in the case diary and as such they have been falsely implicated in the present case.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18235 of 2018 (3) dt.01-05-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on their surrender they will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sri N.K. Yadav, J.M. Ist class, Jamui in connection with Chandradeep P.S.Case nO.114 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U