Sanjay Yadav @ Kukku Yadav @ Kukku v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43368 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2026 Thana- ISHAKCHAK District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Sanjay Yadav @ Kukku Yadav @ Kukku Son of Late Chhathu Yadav Resident of Mohalla- Shyamal Das Lane/Shyamadas Lane, P.S.- Ishakchak, District- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 04.04.2026 in connection with Ishakchak P.S. Case No. 02 of 2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4), 305 of B.N.S.
3. The case of the prosecution in brief is that on 26.12.2025 at about 11.30 'o' clock of the day the informant had gone for Faridabad (Hariyana) alongwith her family members, on 01.01.2026 she got an information from mohalla people that the lock of main gate of her house has broken then she informed her Nandoi Amit Kumar Rahi who came at the place of occurrence and who shown the broken gate of her house on
2/4 video call and he entered into the house and found the entire articles of the house was found in scattered condition and further golden jewellary like Rani Woar 35 gm, Neelace 30 gms, 3 chains total weight of 48 grams. Golden kada of 25 gm, Pala-9 gms Shankha -7 gms, Nath-2 pcs-4 gms Teeka 2 gms Besar of Diamond-1 gm, Diamond Ring -2 pcs. Golden ring -4 pcs of about 20 gms, Mangalsutra 2 pcs of about 31 gms, Jhumka -4 pcs of about 26 gms, Dodhna 2 pcs of about 25 gms, silver payal 4 pcs of about 50 gms, silver Katori plate pan supari about 100 gms was found missing from her Almirah and when she returned back from Haryana and from CCTV camera which was installed in her house she came to know that on 01.01.2026 at 12:56 'o' clock in the night three persons who all had concealed their faces were found wondering near her house as such she has suspected that those three persons have broken the door of the house and have stolen away her golden and silver ornaments.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused person, namely, Golu Kumar and nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner or from the house of the petitioner and till date no TIP has been conducted by the
3/4 prosecution. Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that police after investigation has submitted charge-sheet and petitioner is in custody since 04.04.2026.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that petitioner has antecedent of five cases of similar nature other than the present case but fairly submits that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matters.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. IX, Bhagalpur in connection with Ishakchak P.S. Case No. 02 of 2026, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
4/4 iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Gaurav Sinha/- U T