Chiranjeevi Sagar @ Chiranjivi Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6969 of 2016 (2) dt.02-03-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6969 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -106 Year- 2012 Thana -RUNISAIDPUR District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Chiranjeevi Sagar @ Chiranjivi Bhagat son of Bindeshwar Bhagat, R/o village- Hajpurwa, Hajipur Basant, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.P.S Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 02-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 106 of 2012 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 384 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner having greedy eyes on the land of the informant was pressurizing the informant to execute the deed and the petitioner and other co-accused armed with gun and pistol went on the land of the informant and caused threats to kill him. Submission is of false implication and that no arms has been recovered from possession of the petitioner, due to land dispute the petitioner has been implicated and now by remaining in custody since 30.08.2013 he has sufficiently been penalized and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration to which learned

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6969 of 2016 (2) dt.02-03-2016 APP opposes by submitting that the petitioner has got 24 more criminal cases.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of detention, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Deepak Kumar, J. M. Ist Class, Sitamarhi in connection with Runisaidpur P.S. Case No. 106 of 2012, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T