← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1845/2023disposed

Raj Bansh Singh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-20Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1845 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2834 of 2023 ====================================================== Raj Bansh Singh Yadav Son of Jagdish Singh Yadav, Resident of Bankers Colony, Kadam Gali, Tinpulwa, Jai Prakash Nagar, Post- G.P.O., Police Station- Jakkanpur, District- Patna, the retired Professor, Post Graduate Department of Mathematics, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Amir Subhani, Son of not known to the petitioner presently posted as the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri K.K. Pathak, Son of not known to the petitioner presently posted as the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Dr. Rekha Kumari, Wife of not known to the petitioner presently posted as the Director, Higher Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Dr. Shashi Pratap Shahi, Son of not known to the petitioner presently posted as the Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 5.

Dr. Ravi Prakash, Son of not known to the petitioner presently posted as the Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

6.

Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, Son of not known to the petitioner Presently posted as the Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Smt. Binita Singh (SC 28) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-03-2024 Heard learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner informs this Court that almost all the retiral dues admissible to the petitioner have been paid to the petitioner, however, the learned counsel submits that some dues are still

Patna High Court MJC No.1845 of 2023(8) dt.20-03-2024 2/2 pending, which are required to be paid to the petitioner.

3. Considering that the substantial amount has been paid but the petitioner is still aggrieved for non-payment of the admissible dues, he may file a detailed representation before the appropriate authority, who must ensure to dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of the representation.

4. With the above observation/direction, the present writ petition is disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U