Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54797/2021dismissed

Lalita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-29Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54797 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2020 Thana- KONCH District- Gaya ====================================================== LALITA DEVI Wife of Gaya Yadav Resident of Village- Alpa, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheikh Arkan Ahmad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar Mr. Bam Bahadur Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Konch P.S. Case No.230 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 302, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner and other co-accused persons are said to have killed the father of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is submitted that the allegations are general and omnibus.

Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54797 of 2021(4) dt.29-08-2022 2/2 informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submitted that though the allegations are general and omnibus, but the postmortem report shows that there are several injuries on the body of the deceased and there is allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioner that they assaulted the father of the informant. Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Sanjay/- U T