Mukesh Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48551 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2037 Year-2023 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur ====================================================== Mukesh Pandit S/O Dashrath Pandit R/O Village- Vishunpur Waladhari, Bishunpur Baladhari Urf Balwa Kuaan, P.S- Hajipur, Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Savita Kumari D/O Upendra Pandit R/O Village- Harpur Ailoth, P.SMusarigharari, Distt.- Samastipur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Poddar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Sangeeta Sharma, A.P.P.

Mr. Raja Ram Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner who is husband of opposite party No. 2 apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner offers and undertakes that he is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/- per month, starting from this month, to opposite party No. 2.

4. In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/- (three thousand) per month to the opposite party No. 2, provisional bail granted to the petitioner vide order

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48551 of 2024(3) dt.23-09-2024 2/2 dated 07.08.2024 by co-ordinate Bench of this Court, is hereby, confirmed with the following conditions:- '(1) Opposite party No. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her savings bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the savings bank account of the opposite party No. 2.

(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

(4) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.'

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T