Patna High CourtCWJC/5183/2014dismissed

Anil Kumar Bharti And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-01-07Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5183 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Anil Kumar Bharti S/O Ram Ekwal Prasad Resident Of Village- Lala Tola Lauchan, Post- Laukhan, Police Station- Ghodasahan, District- East Champaran.

2. Naresh Rai S/O Shivpujan Rai Resident Of Village & Post- Titaha, Police Station- Banjariya, District- East Champaran.

3. Naresh Das S/O Late Ramdeo Das Resident Of Village_ Machchhuhan, PostSirsa Colony, Police Station- Motihari Mufassil, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue & Landf Reforms, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel & Administrative Reforms, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna Through It'S Chairman.

4. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna. Null Null

5. The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari.

6. The Additional Collector, ( Revenue), East Champaran, Motihari.

7. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, East Champaran, Motihari. Null Null

8. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division., Muzaffarpur.

9. The Sub- Divisional Officer, East Champaran, Motihari.

10. The Circle Officer, Bankatwa, East Champaran, Motihari.

11. The Circle Officer, Sangrampur, East Champaran, Motihari.

12. The Circle Officer, Kalyanpur, East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Dhurjati Kr Prasad, GP 14 For the BSSC :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 07-01-2019 Counsel for the petitioners, State as well as counsel for the Commission are present.

In view of the order dated 01.08.2016 passed in LPA No. 388 of 2014, counsel for the petitioners submits that the relief prayed in the instant writ proceedings has become infructuous insofar as the advertisement in question is concerned.

Patna High Court CWJC No.5183 of 2014 dt.07-01-2019 2/2 Counsel for the State does not dispute or deny the said assertion.

Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Prakash/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date