Patna High CourtCWJC/2254/2015dismissed

Rajeshwar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-05Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2254 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Rajeshwar Prasad Son of Late Chandra Dip Prasad Resident of Village - Sri Nagar, Police Station - Masurahi, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Chief Engineer, South Bihar, Wing (Communication), Part Division, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Executive Engineer, Road Sub Division, Jehanabad under Road Division No. 1, Jehanabad.

4. The Assistant Engineer, Road, Sub Division, Arwal under Road Division No. 1, Jehanabad.

5. Sri Sidheshwar Prasad Singh Son of not known to the petitioner at present posted as Junior Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division No. 1, Jehanabad.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr R.S.Pradhan, Sr. Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Shamra, AC to AG =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-02-2015 Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner tries to prevail upon this Court by submission that the reason for issuance of Annexure- 7 is otherwise and relates to certain allegations made by the petitioner against certain contractors. Instead of taking action against them, petitioner has been transferred. What had transpired may be another issue altogether. If there is no reflection of the same in the order of transfer contained in Annexure- 7 and since petitioner was on deputation as such to the post he was holding prior to his transfer to

Patna High Court CWJC No.2254 of 2015 dt.05-02-2015 2/2 the basic post without any kind of insinuation, the order of transfer contained in Annexure- 7 is not required to be interfered with on ifs and buts.

Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U