Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43533 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2026 Thana- JALALPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Singh S/o Ramesh Singh R/o Village - Dhup Nagar Dhobwal, PS - Jalalpur, District - Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 25(1-B) (a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that police had information that certain miscreants who are armed with weapons are proceeding towards Baniyapur. On this information, vehicle checking was started and from a suspicious vehicle, two persons were apprehended and from their possession, arms were recovered. They disclosed that the petitioner along with others has provided them the weapons. On this information, the house of the petitioner was searched and from his possession, two live cartridges and a mobile were recovered.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43533 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and police have not complied Section 105 of BNSS. He is having no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 01.04.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Jalalpur P.S. Case No. 123 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Saran at Chapra. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T