Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Soni @ Vikash Soni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56405 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Sita Devi W/O Late Rameshwar Soni R/O-Shanti Vat Vriksh, P.S-Siwan Town, District-Siwan.

2.

Navin Kumar Soni S/O Late Rameshwar Soni R/O-Shanti Vat Vriksh, P.SSiwan Town, District-Siwan. 3.

Alka Devi W/O Navin Kumar Soni R/O-Shanti Vat Vriksh, P.S-Siwan Town, District-Siwan.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Swati Devi W/O Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Soni @ Vikash Soni, D/O Bhagrasan Prasad R/O-Shanti Vat Vriksh, P.S-Siwan Town, District-Siwan. ... ... Opposite Party With CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 55203 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Siwan ====================================================== RAHUL KUMAR @ RAHUL KUMAR SONI @ VIKASH SONI Son of Late Rameshwar Soni Resident of Mohalla- Sonar Toli Jhagdwha Near Peepal Tree, P.S.- Town, District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Swati Devi Wife of Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Soni @ Vikash Soni, Darughter of Bhagrasan Prasad Resident of Shanti Vat Vriksh, P.S.- Siwan Town, District- Siwan.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate Mr.Ankesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Bishweshwar Ram, APP For the O.P. No. 2 :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate Ms.Shyama Rani, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 23-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56405 of 2021(7) dt.23-01-2025 2/2 behalf of the petitioners that dispute between the parties has been resolved with the intervention of learned mediator, whereafter opposite party no. 2 entered into an agreement on 06.10.2023 (Annexure P/6) for separation as well as settlement of criminal case against one time payment of Rs. 11 lakhs.

3. It is submitted that in view of aforesaid compromise, petitioner/husband paid three bank drafts to opposite party no. 2 for a sum of Rs. 11 lakhs. (DD No. 425958 for Rs. 3 Lakhs, DD No. 425966 for Rs. 3 Lakhs and DD No. 426008 for Rs. 5 Lakhs respectively).

4. The aforesaid fact also approved by learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2.

5. In view of aforesaid compromise, petitioner/ husband seeks permission to withdraw the present quashing petition, which has not been objected by learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

6. Considering aforesaid, the present quashing petition stands disposed of in terms of compromise, as discussed above.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Rajeev/- U T