← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43092/2025bail granted

Rajeev Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-09Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43092 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul ====================================================== Rajeev Kumar Yadav S/o Birendra @ Biren Yadav (Sri Birendra Yadav) Permanent Resident of Village- Chandakhera (Chanda Khora) (Khaira Chanda) Ward No. 01, P.S.- Narpatganj, District- Araria, At present R/o Village- Chandakhera Ward No. 01, P.S.- Pipra, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhim Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Nazir Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Pipra P.S. case No. 130 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 130.8 liters liquor was recovered from car.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43092 of 2025(2) dt.09-07-2025 2/2 further submitted that the name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused. The petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the car in question. The petitioner is in custody since 02.06.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S., 2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Pipra P.S. case No. 130 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Pankaj/- U T