← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42927/2025bail granted

Vishwajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-21Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42927 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2024 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna ====================================================== Vishwajeet Kumar Son of Vijay Prasad Resident of Dogi, P.S.- Chhabilapur, District - Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 215 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 420, 341, 323, 506, 509/34 of IPC.

3. According to the allegation, the petitioner called the victim at the pretext of providing her job and committed rape upon her.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. The father of the victim has stated during investigation that the marriage of his daughter was solemnized in the year 2011 with one Vimal Sarma. Later on, her daughter solemnized her second

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42927 of 2025(2) dt.21-08-2025 2/2 marriage with one Ram Pravesh Sharma. His further submission is that two marriages have been solemnized by the victim and the present case has been lodged only with an intention to extort money from the petitioner. He has also submitted that the occurrence is said to have taken place on 24-03-2024 but the FIR was lodged on 9-06-2024 and there is no explanation of delay of near about 3 months in lodging of the FIR. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-III, Barh in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 215 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T